Aurora campaign: Attacking Azerbaijan using multiple RATs

This post was authored by Hossein Jazi

360 Mobile Vision - North & South Carolina Security products and Systems Installations for Commercial and Residential - $55 Hourly Rate. ACCESS CONTROL, INTRUSION ALARM, ACCESS CONTROLLED GATES, INTERCOMS AND CCTV INSTALL OR REPAIR 360 Mobile Vision - is committed to excellence in every aspect of our business. We uphold a standard of integrity bound by fairness, honesty and personal responsibility. Our distinction is the quality of service we bring to our customers. Accurate knowledge of our trade combined with ability is what makes us true professionals. Above all, we are watchful of our customers interests, and make their concerns the basis of our business.

As tensions between Azerbaijan and Armenia continue, we are still seeing a number of cyber attacks taking advantage of this situation. On March 5th 2021, we reported an actor that used steganography to drop a new .Net Remote Administration Trojan. Since that time, we have been monitoring this actor and were able to identify new activity where the threat actor switched their RAT from .Net to Python.

Document Analysis

The document targets the government of Azerbaijan using a SOCAR letter template as lure. SOCAR is the name of Azerbaijan’s Republic Oil and Gas Company. The document’s date is 25th March 2021 and the letter, related to export of catalyst for analysis, is written to the Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources. The document’s creation time is 28th March 2021 and is aligned with the date mentioned on the letter. Based on the dates we believe that this attack happened between 28th and 30th of March 2021.

Aurora campaign: Attacking Azerbaijan using multiple RATs
Figure 1: Document lure

The embedded macro in this document is almost similar to what we have reported before with some small differences. We will talk about the similarities between these two documents in the next section.

The macro has two main functions “Document_Open” and “Document_Close”. In “Document_Open” after defining the required variables it creates a directory (%APPDATA%Roamingnettools48) for its Python Rat.

Figure 2: Document_Open

It then copies itself in a new format to the file path defined before in order to be able to extract the required data from an embedded PNG file (image1.png).

Figure 3: Embedded image

To extract the embedded data, it calls the “ExtractFromPng” function to identify the chunk that has the embedded data. After finding the chunk, it extracts the files from the PNG file and writes them into “”.

Figure 4: Chunk identification

The “” is then extracted into “%APPDATA%Roamingnettools48” directory. It contains the Python 3.6 interpreter, NetTools Python library, Python Rat, the RAT C2 config, as well runner.bat.

Figure 5: Application directory

The Python Rat will be executed when the document is closed. The “Document_Close” first delays execution to bypass security detection mechanisms by creating a junk loop for 100 times and then executes the runner.bat by calling Shell function.

Figure 6: Document_Close

The runner.bat is also delaying execution for 64 seconds and then it calls Python to execute the Python RAT (

SET /A num=%RANDOM% * (80 - 60 + 1) / 32768 + 60
timeout /t %num%
set DIR=%~dp0
"%DIR%python" ""

Python RAT Analysis

The Python RAT used by the attacker is not obfuscated and is pretty simple. It is using the platform library to identify the victim’s OS type.

Figure 7: OS identification

The C2 domain and port are hardcoded within a file in the RAT directory. The RAT opens this file and extracts the host and port from this file.

Figure 8: Reads C2 config

In the next step if the victim is running Windows, it makes itself persistent through creating a scheduled task. It first checks if a scheduled task with the name “paurora*” exists or not. If it does not exist, it reads the content of bg.txt file and creates a bg.vbs file. Then adds the created VBS file to the list of scheduled tasks.

Figure 9: Creates Scheduled task

The created VBS file calls the runner.bat to execute the Python RAT.

Figure 10: Scheduled task

The main functionality of the RAT is through a loop that starts by creating a secure SSL connection to the server using a certificate file (cert.pem) that was extracted from the PNG file and dropped into the RAT directory.

Figure 11: Makes secure connection to server

After building the secure connection to the server it goes to a loop that receives a message from the server and executes different commands based on the message type.

Figure 12: Executes commands

Here is the list of commands that can be executed by the RAT:

  • OPEN_NEW_CONNECTION: Sends a message to the server with False as content
  • HEART_BEAT: Sends a message to the server that the victim is alive
  • USER_INFO: Collects victim info including OS Name, OS Version and User Name
  • SHELL: Executes shell commands received from the server
  • PREPARE_UPLOAD: Checks if it can open a file to write the received data from server into it and if that is the case it sends a “Ready” message to the server
  • UPLOAD: Receives a buffer from the server and writes them into file
  • DOWNLOAD: Archives files and sends them to the server

Similarity Analysis

In this sections we provide the similarities between two documents and TTPs used by them. This will help hunters to identify the future campaigns associated with this actor.

TTPs similarities

  • Used steganography to embed RATs within the embedded images.
  • Used scheduled tasks for persistence. In both cases It created a VBS file to execute the batch runner.
  • Used a batch file with the same name (runner.bat) to execute the final RAT.
  • Used the same technique to exfiltrate data. (Archive them and send them to the server)

Documents similarities

  • Both have been obfuscated using same obfuscation techniques: Inserting random characters within the meaningful names to obfuscate the functions and variables names. After deobfuscation, the function graph of these two documents are almost similar.
Figure 13: Socar.doc
Figure 14: telebler.doc
  • Both have used the similar method to obfuscate strings: using “MyFunc23” function that receives an array of numbers and decodes them into a string.

Other similarities

  • both C2 domains have resolved to the same IP address.
  • There are overlaps between the commands used by both .Net and Python RATs.


Due to tensions between Azerbaijan and Armenia, cyber attacks against these countries have been increasing in the past year. The Malwarebytes Threat Intelligence Team is constantly monitoring actors that are targeting these countries and was able to identify an actor that has targeted Azerbaijan using different RATs. This actor has used .Net and Python RATs to infect victims and steal data from them. The actor used spear phishing as initial vector that has used steganography to drop a variant of its RATs.


socar.doc 42f5f5474431738f91f612d9765b3fc9b85a547274ea64aa034298ad97ad28f4
runner.bat 82eb05b9d4342f5485d337a24c95f951c5a1eb9960880cc3d61bce1d12d27b72 e45ffc61a85c2f5c0cbe9376ff215cad324bf14f925bf52ec0d2949f7d235a00
bg.vbs 1be8d33d8fca08c2886fa4e28fa4af8d35828ea5fd6b41dcad6aeb79d0494b67
C2 Domain pook.mywire[.]org

The post Aurora campaign: Attacking Azerbaijan using multiple RATs appeared first on Malwarebytes Labs.

By admin